The people of California in 2000 voted 61 percent in favor or keeping so-called "gay marriage" (which, of course, is neither) illegal. But no matter, our black-robed masters have spoken and the gay blackshirts are on the march.
California: living proof that, "When you break the big laws, you do not get freedom; you do not even get anarcy. You get the small laws."
Also, Pope Benedict speaks out.
Friday, May 16, 2008
California Supreme Court to democracy: up yours
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
This debacle was brought up last night at my Aquinas study group which was ironically discussing question 83 in the Summa Theoligca--"Of Free Will"
The Court's published opinion points to only one rational explaination---somebody's got compromising photographs of the (pretty much conservative)Justices.
To my understanding the Court was able to do what it did because the Initiative for traditional marriage did not amend the State Constitution but merely enacted a new law which of course the State Supreme Court could (and did)overturn.
An interesting effect this might have is that the Conservatives will be motivated to turn out in force for the next election, but the CSSC has opened up a festering puss pocket of counter culture issues. While the decision is expressly not to effect the illegality of polygamy or incest (according to the Justices,) the question can be raised and logically argued that polygamy, incest, and pedophilia are valid since the issue of sexuality has been divorced from Natural Law (or more correctly, the CSSC has stuck it's collective finger in the eye of Natural Law!)
This is serious---and you can bet there will be a fight but with the State Supreme Court railroading their perverted agenda it isn't going to be pretty.
Post a Comment